ZIMBABWE RIT CLEARANCE PROCEDURES PORT OF ENTRY
Port of Exit
ZIMRA CONTROL
HOW FUEL RIT FRAUD IS BEING DONE ON FORBES-CHIRUNDU ROUTE.
According to ZIMRA’s Head Corporate Communications representative, talking to social media on 263Chat, he highlighted how the fuel RIT fraud is being done as follows;
- The smugglers scout for ports in the region with the weakest controls, where they can declare falsely low values or quantities for their fuel imports.
- The smugglers obtain transit documents and seals from ZIMRA or other authorities, and place them on their trucks.
- The smugglers offload and sell the fuel in Zimbabwe at higher prices than the official market prices.
- The smugglers load the trucks with water and proceed to Chirundu for the acquittal process, where they remove the seals and present their transit documents.
- The smugglers enter Zambia where they drain the water and buy cheaper fuel for delivery to their customers or they come up with fictitious transactions purpoting to have sold fuel outside Zimbabwe.
Existing Customs Transit Fraud Fighting Procedures
Most of the systems of managing and processing removals in transit that are in use today follow major guidelines from the World Customs Organization (WCO) in the Revised Kyoto Convention (RKC) under transit guidelines (2017 publication). According to the RKC, the transit guarantee and strict security measures such as Customs convoys
or escorts are mutually exclusive practices –whenever a guarantee is provided, Customs convoys or escorts should not be applied. In exceptional cases, or at the request of the operator, Customs convoys and escorts can be applied. TIR Convention under Transit Guidelines provide recommendations for the following matters related to the customs seals and other security measures:
- General principles for the use of Customs seals
and other security measures; - Specific provisions on Customs seals;
- Electronic Customs seals (not covered by the RKC);
- Security measures for loading units (not covered by the RKC);
- Prescribed time limit and transit itinerary;
- Customs convoys and escorts;
- Road checkpoints.
How these measures affect clearing agents operations
- Delays
The proposed procedure is tiresome, the challenge may start with the depositing of funds which sometimes take time to reflect. Already sometimes there are long queues here and there experienced at Forbes and Chirundu and this will add disaster. - Additional Costs,
The clearing agent who are clearing these fuels already have RIT Agent bond with ZIMRA on which they are paying insurance to insurance companies, so now
introducing new procedure means that they have to make an arrangement to deposit money into their prepayment account for them to do fuel RIT. Therefore additional funds are needed. - Refund processes
Although, the minister directed the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority to manage the duty refund process efficiently through dedicated bank accounts, when it comes to Zimra refund process, it has always
been a battle. It is highly likely that these refunds will take time to be reversed back into agent’s prepayment accounts. This will further disrupt business, causing delays and congestions at ports of entry, thereby increasing cost of doing business.
Recommendations
The new proposed duty depositing procedure is likely to fail because, the procedure is targeting the duties in ASYCUDA rather than the actual product. In a coordinated smuggling, the money can be deposited and acquitted very easily, purported fuel which in many cases is the water, can be acquitted. The issue is to strictly keep the eye on the product from the port of entry and port of exit by, improving on IT tools.
The information at hand is pointing to the fact that the major weaknesses of the RIT system used by ZIMRA
are connectivity lapses, poorly developed RIT modules for use by staff and clearing agents, poor record
security/data security, integrity issues or challenges, corrupt business community, lack of support systems to complement the existing system like the cargo monitoring systems and effective risk management systems, weak monitoring systems, fraudulent Guarantors and too much human
intervention/interference in the system.